🚨 Kerberos Relay Attack Uses DNS CNAME to Bypass Mitigations – PoC Released

A newly disclosed attack technique has revealed a critical weakness in Windows Kerberos authentication, significantly expanding the attack surface for credential relay attacks in Active Directory (AD) environments. Security researchers have demonstrated how attackers can abuse DNS CNAME records to bypass existing Kerberos relay mitigations — and a proof-of-concept (PoC) has now been released.

This discovery raises serious concerns for enterprises relying on Kerberos-based authentication, especially those that believe existing protections are sufficient.

🔐 Understanding Kerberos Authentication (Quick Overview)

Kerberos is the default authentication protocol used in Microsoft Active Directory environments. It relies on:

• Tickets instead of passwords

• Mutual authentication

• Time-based trust

• Centralized control via Domain Controllers

Kerberos is considered more secure than legacy protocols like NTLM. However, misconfigurations and design assumptions can still be exploited.

🧠 What Is a Kerberos Relay Attack?

A Kerberos relay attack occurs when an attacker tricks a victim system into authenticating to a malicious service, then relays that authentication to another service to gain unauthorized access.

Traditionally, these attacks were limited by:

• Service Principal Name (SPN) validation

• Channel binding

• Extended Protection for Authentication (EPA)

But this new technique shows that DNS behavior can undermine those protections.

⚠️ What’s New in This Attack?

The newly discovered method abuses how Windows clients process DNS CNAME records during Kerberos service ticket requests.

🔍 Key Insight:

When a Windows system requests a Kerberos service ticket, it:

1. Resolves the service hostname using DNS

2. Trusts the resolved canonical name (CNAME)

3. Requests a Kerberos ticket based on that resolution

Attackers can exploit this behavior by manipulating DNS CNAME responses, redirecting authentication to attacker-controlled services.

🌐 Role of DNS CNAME in the Attack

A CNAME (Canonical Name) record maps one hostname to another.

Example:

service.company.local → attacker-controlled.host

If an attacker can:

• Control DNS responses

• Be positioned on-path (MITM)

• Or manipulate internal DNS

They can redirect Kerberos authentication requests without alerting the victim system.

⚠️ The client believes it is authenticating to a legitimate service.

🚨 Why Existing Mitigations Fail

Many organizations believe they are protected because they have implemented:

• SMB signing

• NTLM restrictions

• EPA (Extended Protection for Authentication)

• SPN hardening

However, this attack:

• Does not rely on NTLM

• Bypasses traditional relay protections

• Exploits trusted DNS resolution logic

🧨 This makes the attack particularly dangerous in well-hardened environments.

 

🧪 Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Released

Security researchers have released a proof-of-concept demonstration to show that this attack is practical and reproducible in real-world Active Directory environments.

⚠️ Important:

• The PoC demonstrates feasibility

• It does NOT require exotic zero-days

• It relies on common network positioning or DNS influence

The release of a PoC significantly increases the risk of:

• Weaponization

• Copycat attacks

• Inclusion in red-team and threat actor toolkits

  🏢 Who Is at Risk?

  Organizations most at risk include:

• Enterprises with large Active Directory environments

• Networks with shared or flat DNS infrastructure

• Environments without strict DNS security controls

• Organizations using Kerberos for internal service authentication

Especially vulnerable:

• Internal web services

• File servers

• Management interfaces

• Legacy Kerberos-dependent applications

  🔎 Attack Prerequisites (High-Level)

  An attacker typically needs one or more of the following:

• On-path network position

• Ability to influence DNS responses

• Access to internal DNS infrastructure

• Compromised internal system

This makes the attack more realistic for insider threats, advanced attackers, or post-compromise scenarios.

🛡️ Recommended Defensive Measures

While no single fix fully eliminates the risk, organizations should consider:

🔐 Strengthening DNS Security

• Use DNSSEC where possible

• Monitor suspicious CNAME changes

• Restrict who can create or modify DNS records

🧠 Kerberos Hardening

• Audit SPN usage

• Minimize unnecessary Kerberos services

• Apply latest Microsoft security updates

📊 Monitoring & Detection

• Monitor anomalous Kerberos ticket requests

• Alert on unusual service ticket behavior

• Track authentication attempts to unexpected hosts

🔄 Network Segmentation

• Reduce on-path attack opportunities

• Isolate critical services

• Enforce least privilege networking

  🧩 Why This Matters for Active Directory Security

  Active Directory remains a prime target for attackers because:

• It controls identity

• It grants lateral movement

• It enables privilege escalation

This attack highlights a broader issue:

Even strong authentication protocols can fail when supporting systems like DNS are trusted too much.

Security is only as strong as its weakest dependency.

🌍 Broader Impact on Enterprise Security

This research reinforces several critical lessons:

• Authentication security is not just about passwords or tickets

• DNS is a critical security boundary

• “Mitigated” does not mean “invulnerable”

• Defense-in-depth is mandatory

Organizations relying solely on protocol-level protections may have a false sense of security.

🔮 What to Expect Next

With a PoC publicly available, security teams should expect:

• Increased testing by red teams

• Detection rule updates

• Possible future patches or guidance from Microsoft

• Real-world abuse by advanced threat actors

Proactive defense is crucial.

🏁 Final Thoughts

The discovery of a Kerberos relay attack using DNS CNAME records represents a serious evolution in authentication abuse techniques.

🚨 It bypasses traditional mitigations
🌐 Exploits trusted DNS behavior
🧠 Expands the Kerberos attack surface

Organizations should treat this as a high-priority awareness issue, even if exploitation requires advanced positioning.

Security teams must rethink how identity, authentication, and DNS trust intersect in modern networks.

 

📢 Join Our Telegram Channel for Cyber Alerts

Stay updated with:
🚨 Active Directory attacks
🔐 Authentication vulnerabilities
🧠 Beginner-friendly security explanations
🌍 Real-world cyber threats

👉 Join our Telegram channel now

 
  Join Telegram